12 May 2006
Posted by J. Angelo Racoma as Communications, Gadgets, Mobile
I’ve owned a handful of Nokia phones, from the most basic of analog units, to mid-range and even some higher-end models. Nowadays, though I’m not really much of a Nokia fan as I’ve never really liked the Nokia interface, which I found too clunky (but it seems to work well with everyone else). And I started to have a preference for Siemens phones since about three years back (but now I hate them, and I’ll explain later why). Now, I use a Smart Amazing Phone SmartPhone, of course unlocked, updated with a different firmware (I-Mate), and hacked to hell.
At any rate, I’ve lost interest in getting the latest in mobile telephony lately—I used to change phones every so often, but I’ve moved on to better stuff (laptops!).
This evening I accompanied my brother, B.A., to buy a phone—his Siemens M65 gave out on him a month ago and the Siemens S45i I loaned him also gave out just a couple of days back. So he thought of getting a cheapo, no-frills phone for the meantime, just so he can have something to call and text with. So after checking out the available models and much consultation with me (the supposed mobile phone expert), he got the low-end Nokia 1100 for PhP 2,700 (about US$ 45; with one-year official Nokia warranty). It’s something that won’t get anyone drooling with envy or having palms sweaty with excitement. It’s cheap, it’s nothing fancy. But it just plain works.
Somehow the thought of just having a basic phone with a long battery life comes as quite an exciting concept to me. You can just leave it in your bag, pocket, man-purse, or glove compartment (but not in tropical weathers) and not have to worry about losing juice in the middle of nowhere (unless you haven’t charged for a week) or dropping it and scratching that precious shiny new gadget surface.
In short, a cheapo Nokia won’t give you headaches. That’s unless you get hit on your head with it. But it probably won’t give you as much as a bump as with the older, brick-type phones (an example of which is the Motorla Micro-Tac UltraLite of the mid-1990’s, which I still have lying on my desk, for memories’ sake and as a toy for my kids).
And I think that’s what the 1100 was designed for. A quick check with Wikipedia says the 1xxx series (eleventy zero zero? How the heck are you supposed to pronounce that?) is supposed to stand for “ultrabasic.” Do check out the Wikipedia entry for Nokia phones if you fancy learning more about Nokia model nomenclature and model availability through time.
While we chanced by a handful of cheaper models, too (the Motorola C1xx series, which retails for about PhP 1,500 or US$ 30, for instance), B.A. opted for what he considered a more trusted brand.
So here’s to cheap, durable, mass-oriented mobile phones!
Take stock of your health. Learn about hypertension now.
Tags: Cellphone, Cellular, Cheap, Communications, Gadgets, Mobile, Nokia | Viewed 5657 times
7 Responses
audienceone
May 13th, 2006 at 2:01 am
1wadjaknow… I use the HTC Tanager myself… unlocked, updated (Q-Tek) but I got tired of hacking it over and over again once this phone’s mem’ry gets a bit crazy and won’t load the system anymore. Just wondering what hacks u’re using… I believe you’ve been to http://www.airfagev.com haven’t checked them out for a while now.
J. Angelo Racoma
May 13th, 2006 at 2:25 am
2I thought Q-tek was good, but it didn’t have English T9! And I rely on T9 80 percent of the time (even when typing in tagalog).
On hacks, well, it’s mostly in the apps and tools I’ve installed, and some registry tweaks via RJV’s regtweaks UI—oh, and the original USB cable-turned USB charger hardware hack!
But I’ve come to realize that once the novelty wears off, your high-tech smartphone just turns into one of those texting and calling machines with fancy addressbooks and calendars most of the time.
Case in point: my main calendar tool is Google Calendar, and not my SmartPhone’s. I’m not really into MS Outlook. That might change, though, once people get to work on the GCal API for syncing with Outlook.
jong
May 13th, 2006 at 5:43 pm
3binilhan ako ng aking ama ng 5210 noong 2002 nong bagong labas pa siya. hangang ngayon eto parin ang gamit ko. hehe pero gusto ko narin bumili ng isa pang fone para naman bago haha. may sentimental value na siguro itong luma ko hehe
taorist
May 15th, 2006 at 7:35 am
4Yes, most geeks go low-tech these days. LOLZ
Have you checked out the hPDA yet?
J. Angelo Racoma
May 15th, 2006 at 8:10 am
5Ah, yes. Who couldn’t resist the hipster PDA?
Tried that. Gave up after a few days.
taorist
May 15th, 2006 at 8:45 am
6Yeah, hPDA rocks in some circles. There seems to be quite a backlash to low techies now.
Forever Geek
June 6th, 2006 at 1:39 pm
7Do I Really Want A Cutting-Edge Mobile Phone?...
This is the question that perhaps all of us mobile phone users and afficionadoes—okay, mobile phone geeks—ask ourselves every few months (or even weeks). When the mobile manufacturers come out with their latest models, or when the telcos come up…...
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply