<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commercial Art vs. Art for Art&#8217;s Sake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://racoma.com.ph/archives/commercial-art-vs-art-for-arts-sake/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/commercial-art-vs-art-for-arts-sake</link>
	<description>J. Angelo Racoma on technology, economics, writing, problogging, and getting things done</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndieHype</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/commercial-art-vs-art-for-arts-sake/comment-page-1#comment-115306</link>
		<dc:creator>IndieHype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.com.ph/archives/commercial-art-vs-art-for-arts-sake/#comment-115306</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gus Van Sant to direct new Tupac film??!...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gus Van Sant to direct new Tupac film??!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/commercial-art-vs-art-for-arts-sake/comment-page-1#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 05:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.com.ph/archives/commercial-art-vs-art-for-arts-sake/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Talents are not intended to be hiden or stay stagnant, to my opion that is. If I were given the skill I&#039;ll use to the full extent in whatever I could but never to harm anyone. If there&#039;s anyone who really wants to show his/her appreciation of my talent won&#039;t they do it by helping me financially?

If I had the talent to assemble and fix things (computers perhaps) I&#039;d like to earn from that talent. If I had been bestowed with the gift of artistic inclination, I like to profit from it.

It&#039;s these skills that somebody may be looking for I&#039;m not going to deprive him/her of the pleasure praising my work. I&#039;m sure he/she would not also mind allowing me to profit by my own creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talents are not intended to be hiden or stay stagnant, to my opion that is. If I were given the skill I&#8217;ll use to the full extent in whatever I could but never to harm anyone. If there&#8217;s anyone who really wants to show his/her appreciation of my talent won&#8217;t they do it by helping me financially?</p>
<p>If I had the talent to assemble and fix things (computers perhaps) I&#8217;d like to earn from that talent. If I had been bestowed with the gift of artistic inclination, I like to profit from it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s these skills that somebody may be looking for I&#8217;m not going to deprive him/her of the pleasure praising my work. I&#8217;m sure he/she would not also mind allowing me to profit by my own creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhay</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/commercial-art-vs-art-for-arts-sake/comment-page-1#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>jhay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 00:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.com.ph/archives/commercial-art-vs-art-for-arts-sake/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I think you really can&#039;t seperate the two, you&#039;re an artist so you&#039;ll create art, but you&#039;re also a human being with basic needs and wants so you have to earn something for subsistence, commercial art kicks in. Purists who abhor the idea of creating art for trade or commercial purposes are living in a different age, it&#039;s the capitalist age already, everything else is now being traded as a commodity, art incldued. 

As for art for art&#039;s sake, I&#039;m not a big fan of this line. Art in all of its form was created for a purpose, whatever that purpose is, and not just for the heck of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you really can&#8217;t seperate the two, you&#8217;re an artist so you&#8217;ll create art, but you&#8217;re also a human being with basic needs and wants so you have to earn something for subsistence, commercial art kicks in. Purists who abhor the idea of creating art for trade or commercial purposes are living in a different age, it&#8217;s the capitalist age already, everything else is now being traded as a commodity, art incldued. </p>
<p>As for art for art&#8217;s sake, I&#8217;m not a big fan of this line. Art in all of its form was created for a purpose, whatever that purpose is, and not just for the heck of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

