<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: com.ph? Why not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not</link>
	<description>J. Angelo Racoma on technology, economics, writing, problogging, and getting things done</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rodelio Lagahit</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not#comment-145727</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodelio Lagahit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 07:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.net/archives/comph-why-not/#comment-145727</guid>
		<description>CNO's now cost $ 5.95 (www.1and1.com)

No improvement from dotph pricing yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">CNO</span>&#8217;s now cost $ 5.95 (<a href="http://www.1and1.com" title="http://www.1and1.com">www.1and1.com</a>)</p>
<p>No improvement from dotph pricing yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: one19</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not#comment-2411</link>
		<dc:creator>one19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.net/archives/comph-why-not/#comment-2411</guid>
		<description>"But something tells me that will change in the near future." (pricing for .COM.PH)

I've heard that line from dotPH themselves and I'm still waiting. So long as they keep their prices at $35, I don't think it's a good idea at all to promote .COM.PH. I don't want to be feeding a monopoly (specially if they don't play fair).

A logical move would be for them to at least reprice at $15. That's a fair compromise considering that CNO domains are approximately $8-$9 a year.

By the way, the actual costs for CNO domains exceed $6. So companies offering domains for less than that (e.g. Yahoo $2.95 domains) are basically trying to reel in customers and hope to get additional services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But something tells me that will change in the near future.&#8221; (pricing for <a href="http://.COM.PH" title="http://.COM.PH">.COM.PH</a>)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that line from dotPH themselves and I&#8217;m still waiting. So long as they keep their prices at $35, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a good idea at all to promote <a href="http://.COM.PH" title="http://.COM.PH">.COM.PH</a>. I don&#8217;t want to be feeding a monopoly (specially if they don&#8217;t play fair).</p>
<p>A logical move would be for them to at least reprice at $15. That&#8217;s a fair compromise considering that <span class="caps">CNO</span> domains are approximately $8-$9 a year.</p>
<p>By the way, the actual costs for <span class="caps">CNO</span> domains exceed $6. So companies offering domains for less than that (e.g. Yahoo $2.95 domains) are basically trying to reel in customers and hope to get additional services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: audienceone</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>audienceone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.net/archives/comph-why-not/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>*experiencing rather...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*experiencing rather&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: audienceone</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>audienceone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.net/archives/comph-why-not/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that, experience a setback with the custom hack I used for the blogspot account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that, experience a setback with the custom hack I used for the blogspot account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.net/archives/comph-why-not/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Great thoughts, Raymond. I tried leaving a comment on your site, but it doesn't seem to publish anything I submit--I had issues with the CAPTCHA verification also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thoughts, Raymond. I tried leaving a comment on your site, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to publish anything I submit&#8212;I had issues with the <span class="caps">CAPTCHA</span> verification also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Olavides</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Olavides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 20:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.net/archives/comph-why-not/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite="http://audienceone.blogspot.com/2006/05/filipino-blogger-and-domain.html"&gt;... The initial plan was to get a .ph to simply say to the world that "hey! this site is by a Filipino, for the Filipinos" but after days of price and feature comparison ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Here goes my thoughts on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<blockquote cite="http://audienceone.blogspot.com/2006/05/filipino-blogger-and-domain.html">... The initial plan was to get a .ph to simply say to the world that &#8220;hey! this site is by a Filipino, for the Filipinos&#8221; but after days of price and feature comparison &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Here goes my thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.net/archives/comph-why-not/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Yep, right now, it's about three times the annual cost, and the minimum is two years. So the cheapest you can get .ph domains for is PhP 3,500 for two years. In contrast, I got my .net domain for only about PhP 500 for a year.

But something tells me that will change in the near future. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, right now, it&#8217;s about three times the annual cost, and the minimum is two years. So the cheapest you can get .ph domains for is PhP 3,500 for two years. In contrast, I got my .net domain for only about PhP 500 for a year.</p>
<p>But something tells me that will change in the near future. <img src='http://racoma.com.ph/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Moreno</title>
		<link>http://racoma.com.ph/archives/comph-why-not#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Moreno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racoma.net/archives/comph-why-not/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I also wanted to have my own .ph domain but I decided not to because of the cost. But I also believe that the relative price of .ph compared with .com has a bigger impact than the absolute price. 

If the price of .ph and CNO domains are the same, a lot of Pinoys will go for .ph even if it costs 1,500 pesos.

Unfortunately, a .ph domain is relatively too expensive compared to a CNO domain. So now a Pinoy might think he will pay too much if he go for a .ph.  Imagine, one .ph domain costs three CNO domains. If a Pinoy is willing to spend 1,500 pesos, he might consider buying 3 CNO domains (covering .com, .net, .org) rather that a single .ph.

If the price difference between .ph and a CNO is only 1 or 2 hundred pesos, cost will not anymore be a big factor. The benefit of having your own .ph domain will outweigh the extra 2 hundred pesos. Of course, this is just a pricing theory and from what I've learned, pricing is more of an art than science :)

I am also speaking from an individual standpoint. For me, 1,500 is too much but for a business entity, even for a small enterprise, it may not be an issue. As an individual, I am price sensitive because I need to produce this amount but for companies, they have ways to source the money either passing it to their clients, or tax incentive.

I guess dotPH is banking on companies - who are willing to pay the higher amount. Let's assume the real cost of a domain is only 500 pesos. If dotPH offers a .ph for 700 pesos, the profit is 200 pesos (I am simplifying things here.)  To reach a profit of 20,000,  100 people must buy a .ph domain.  But if dotPH offers it at 1,500 pesos, they only need 20 buyers to reach the same profit as with 100 people on 700 pesos price tag.  Same profit, less clients (and less client to support, to maintain, to monitor, etc.)

Sometimes, to be profitable, you don't need to have more customers. Just get more money from few customers.

What dotPH can do is offer discounts to individuals in exchange for something. For example, a .ph for non-commercial use or single user blog website in exchange for an ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wanted to have my own .ph domain but I decided not to because of the cost. But I also believe that the relative price of .ph compared with .com has a bigger impact than the absolute price.</p>
<p>If the price of .ph and <span class="caps">CNO</span> domains are the same, a lot of Pinoys will go for .ph even if it costs 1,500 pesos.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, a .ph domain is relatively too expensive compared to a <span class="caps">CNO</span> domain. So now a Pinoy might think he will pay too much if he go for a .ph.  Imagine, one .ph domain costs three <span class="caps">CNO</span> domains. If a Pinoy is willing to spend 1,500 pesos, he might consider buying 3 <span class="caps">CNO</span> domains (covering .com, .net, .org) rather that a single .ph.</p>
<p>If the price difference between .ph and a <span class="caps">CNO</span> is only 1 or 2 hundred pesos, cost will not anymore be a big factor. The benefit of having your own .ph domain will outweigh the extra 2 hundred pesos. Of course, this is just a pricing theory and from what I&#8217;ve learned, pricing is more of an art than science <img src='http://racoma.com.ph/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I am also speaking from an individual standpoint. For me, 1,500 is too much but for a business entity, even for a small enterprise, it may not be an issue. As an individual, I am price sensitive because I need to produce this amount but for companies, they have ways to source the money either passing it to their clients, or tax incentive.</p>
<p>I guess dotPH is banking on companies &#8211; who are willing to pay the higher amount. Let&#8217;s assume the real cost of a domain is only 500 pesos. If dotPH offers a .ph for 700 pesos, the profit is 200 pesos (I am simplifying things here.)  To reach a profit of 20,000,  100 people must buy a .ph domain.  But if dotPH offers it at 1,500 pesos, they only need 20 buyers to reach the same profit as with 100 people on 700 pesos price tag.  Same profit, less clients (and less client to support, to maintain, to monitor, etc.)</p>
<p>Sometimes, to be profitable, you don&#8217;t need to have more customers. Just get more money from few customers.</p>
<p>What dotPH can do is offer discounts to individuals in exchange for something. For example, a .ph for non-commercial use or single user blog website in exchange for an ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
